Monday, September 21, 2009
The Inevitable Assessment of a Modern Major Genral
The report leaked today from Gen. William McChrystal, the commander of all forces in Afghanistan said that unless forces are dramatically increased, the American effort there is likely to fail. He may be right, after all he has his McChrystal balls to rely on. But on the other hand, what are the chances that any general is going to recommend retreat, which will always look to some as a failure, as opposed to going all in which at least has a chance of "winning" whatever that may be in a place as poor, corrupt, remote, ungoverned, and unconquered as Afghanistan? Pulling out is no choice any military man would ever take. Leave that to the Commander-in-Chief, a civilian whose calculations on such matters have to take into account many more factors than anything a general has to worry about. This does not demean the general's advice in any way, but rather places it in context along with any other sources of advice the president must take into consideration.
Labels: risk, innovation, middle class, liberalism
Afghanistan,
commander-in-chief,
McChrystal
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It goes without saying that our military is very, very wary of getting pulled into another Vietnam scenario, where a lack of overall political resolve results in an unwinnable situation for the troops. Given the Obama regime’s political instincts and lack of military culture, I don’t think that fear is necessarily misplaced. And see what Lind has to say here:
http://www.d-n-i.net/dni/2009/08/25/on-war-313-war-of-exhaustion-or-war-of-maneuver/
Post a Comment